The Ingredients Of A Future Hydrogen Economy: Fluor

As momentum builds to transition to a low-emissions economy partly powered by hydrogen, there are a number of rapidly evolving pieces to the puzzle in order to make the transition a successful, and profitable one.

From production method to choice of technology, to location and resource allocation, to supply chain and end market, companies will need to evaluate comprehensively all components collectively, not just as independent aspects of how to create the hydrogen economy.

Both companies and governments will need to be pragmatic and fit-for-purpose in order to capture the market being chased by countries around the world, said David Mercer, Director of Technology – Energy Solutions at Fluor Canada.

 “Where we stand today [as an industry] is we're challenging ourselves to integrate these different facets and channels of knowledge that we have coming in. There's not one comprehensive and holistic piece of work that attempts to bring that storyline together from an Alberta point of view.”

This is particularly the case in the nascent market for blue hydrogen — which combines the proven steam methane reforming process with emerging carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) processes — that is poised for rapid growth around the world.

In order to facilitate a future economy which is partially fuelled by hydrogen, companies will need to consider not only choice of technologies but also potential for immediate implementation, stand-alone cost competitiveness and material reduction in greenhouse gas emissions for any world-scale hydrogen production strategies.

Fluor, which has a long history in engineering such projects, is looking at the hydrogen opportunity specific to Canada, to “understand all of the facets that would need to be satisfied to make this business case successful,” Mercer said.

Specifically, Fluor envisions six different components that are key to determining the business case success of using hydrogen as an alternative fuel, starting with a meaningful reduction in emissions. “We certainly see that a number of industry operators are seeking ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by employing creative technologies,” he said.

“We also believe that world-scale hydrogen production plants would be required [in order to] take advantage of economies of scale.”

Thirdly, the use of proven technology will advantage companies when it comes to de-risking their investments. “We have many conversations with owner-operator companies on how to take a due diligence and responsible development [path] in terms of de-risking, and one way we can do that is by the use of proven technology.”

And crucially, it has to lead to a means of producing hydrogen at an acceptable cash cost — to have standalone cost competitiveness as an alternative energy source.

Finally, companies need to take into account the demand side of the equation — where and how the hydrogen will be used, a rapidly evolving question as hydrogen is being examined as a clean energy source for a number of applications — as a transportation fuel, as a supplement to [or replacement for] natural gas, and in difficult to decarbonize industrial processes.

“Whether we're blending it into natural gas pipelines, or potentially using it as an alternative fuel to gasoline or diesel, hydrogen must have that standalone cost competitiveness in any of those areas to be considered a viable alternative.”

As the world transitions to hydrogen - some 30 countries have announced hydrogen strategies to involve billions of dollars of investment over the next decade - engineering companies like Fluor have pivoted to provide the design capabilities needed to meet the needs of what could be a rapidly expanding sector.

 “The technologies used for the manufacture of hydrogen have certainly advanced in the past 50 years,” said Mercer. “Fluor’s experience in the design and construction of hydrogen facilities has allowed us to stay at the forefront of this technology evolution, and effectively incorporate important considerations such as co-locating new facilities adjacent to existing industrial assets.”

And of course, the production of hydrogen today is closely linked to the management of the resultant CO2 being produced. “We recognize the interrelationships between the technologies and we understand owner-operator objectives. We have the expertise to satisfy multiple [sometimes competing] objectives, such as hydrogen production, CO2 mitigation and asset electrification opportunities, to name a few.”

Carbon capture expertise

Fluor already has a head start. The century-old company that has operated in Canada since the 1940s has developed expertise in all aspects of blue hydrogen production, including CCS. In 2012, Royal Dutch Shell selected Fluor as its Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) contractor for its carbon capture facility for its flagship Quest Carbon Capture & Sequestration project at the Scotford Refinery project outside of Edmonton.

In that case, Fluor used award-winning technology to optimize modularization for the project, its third generation modular execution approach. While modularization is not new, the level of achievable offsite work was significantly increased by using the company’s advanced modularization strategy. This execution model splits the project into process blocks and moves into designing modules that then drive the plot plan.